Overview of Metadata 2010 and OpenGov2.0 Initiative
Filed under Uncategorized
We’ve been asked to put together a brief overview of our recent Metadata conference and OpenGov “unconference” held at University House, ANU in the last week of May 2010.
From the outset we knew that this, being the third event (the first with the International Metadata Forum in Sydney in 2008 and then last year’s event at ABS), needed to be the event from which we could then develop our thinking in how we can best serve the metadata and information management communities, beginning in government, education and research, and eventually linking into the private and corporate sector. Did we meet this objective? From my perspective I think we did and I invite my colleagues to comment on that.
We had 106 registrations for the Conference itself from a range of government departments; 39 speakers from six different countries; we had an organising committee of 11 from a range of both private and public sector organisations, and we had 109 registrations to the “unconference” on the Friday. Of those most turned up, and were actively involved in the activities.
Whilst there was a mix of technologies available for people to utilise (albeit restricted by the ANU bandwidth) people were mainly focused on having conversations and meeting each other. However, there was quite a bit of activity on the “back channel” and there were over 380 tweets with 39 people contributing from around the world and people following the conversation.
We asked people whether they thought that “the meaning of Open Government is understood by governments and citizens alike to which a large majority said “no” but when we asked if they thought that the tools were available it was fairly even with people saying “yes” by a whisker.
So what does this mean? For us it means that there is still much to do and, having now created an event that seems to be serving a need, we will now focus on what comes next.
We have booked University House for 25th – 27th May, 2011, and have already received a number of “expressions of interest” from people to both attend and present. We would like to start some conversations with State governments about perhaps holding some events in other capitals, and we would like to explore the opportunity to undertake some research.
To wrap up we will leave the summary to a few of our delegates who have said the following:
“The diversity of guest speakers allowed metadata to be thought about across a range of forms and disciplines. However, I think that the most positive aspect was the air of openness and collaborative discussion that permeated and grew throughout the 3 days”
“One of the best outcomes for us was making contact with people who are happy to share their experiences in a similar situation”
“Add some structure around the really cool ideas that came out of this. Need to understand the value. Companies need to be more involved in these conversations, learning to work better with government.”
We would very much welcome your feedback and you can either join this conversation or email us at info@digitalbrand.org directly.
Jun05


- admin
- Deshawn Laux
- Terry
- BecSherritt